Thursday 24 January 2013

Effective communication in project management

Introduction

Effective communication has been identified as one of the critical success factors in project management because it helps to make people focussed (Portny et al., 2008; Stolovitch, n.d.). However, communication is more than just sending and receiving messages. Effective communication is about sharing information in such a way that other people’s attitudes and behaviours can be influenced (Portny et al., 2008) through understanding the message.  Below is a You Tube video by Maximum Advantage that explains the steps in the communication process, namely message formulation, encoding, sending, decoding, understanding and feedback:


Factors that influence effective communication

Factors that influence effective communication include the following:
whether the right message is being shared with the right person Portny et al., 2008); the way the message is formulated and delivered; the mode of delivery; "tonality and body language; personality of the recipient" (Stolovitch, n.d.).

An exercise to evaluate communication effectiveness

Project communication can be formal or informal, written or oral. Although informal communication occurs on a daily basis, Portny et al. (2008) and Stolovitch (n.d.) have recommended that there is need to confirm, in writing, important information communicated informally. While most written communication nowadays is done through emails, oral communication is normally done through face to face meetings and the telephone.

I had the opportunity to carry out an exercise that involved observing and evaluating a piece of communication in three different modalities, as written text, as audio, and as video. The communication was sent by Jane requesting her team member Mark to send his outstanding report as soon as possible so that it could be incorporated in her report before the deadline. I have summarized my thoughts about the effectiveness of each mode of communication below, however, I need to point out that different recipients would probably interpret these messages differently because the personality of each recipient is different (Stolovitch, n.d.).

Email message

I had to re-read the message in order to fully understand it. The message did not immediately motivate me to act and respond to the communicator.

Voice message

The message was communicated in a friendly tone and the communicator was enthusiastic. This message made me empathise with the communicator. I found the message to be the most effective as it conveyed the subject matter clearly in a persuasive manner.

Face to face video message

The message was not communicated effectively because the communicator lacked enthusiasm and the body language was inappropriate. The manner in which the message was communicated did not show the urgency of the request. I found this message to be the least effective.

Nonverbal communication or body language

Research has suggested that nonverbal behaviour plays an important role in the communication process. Wertheim (n.d.) (as cited in Segal, Smith, Boose & Jaffe, 2013) has suggested that nonverbal communication cues can play the following different roles in either enhancing or diminishing the message: repetition, contradiction, substitution, complementing and accenting. However, Jain & Choudhary (2011) have warned that nonverbal communication is culture dependent and is therefore likely to be misinterpreted in different communities.

Implications for project management communication

The project manager needs to choose the most appropriate communication approach to suit the situation. For example, Stolovitch (n.d.) has suggested that important information is best delivered orally in the presence of all team members. There is need to use different modes of communication to suit different situations and preferences of different recipients. Some situations call for combined use of written and oral communication as well as appropriate body language. Irrespective of the communication approach used, the message should be delivered in such a way that it is understood by the recipient.

References

Jain, C. & Choudhary, M. (2011). Actions speak louder than words: Non-verbal mis/communication. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 3(1), 22-26. Retrieved from

Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Segal, J., Smith, M., Boose, G. & Jaffe, J. (2013). Nonverbal communication:
Improving your nonverbal skills and reading body language. Retrieved from

Stolovitch, H. (Walden University). (n.d.). Communicating with stakeholders. [DVD].

Web sites visited:

1 comment:

  1. Thank you for a great post on communication and how essential this component is to any human interactions. When I viewed and listened to the messages, my reaction was similar to yours, that the voice recording was the best of the three. In Dr.Stolovitch's video this week, he mentioned that face-to-face meetings were best for critical points in the project but that the written and verbal were fine for project deliverables.

    ReplyDelete